t2000_job_claim

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses on-chain nature, first-come-first-served, immediate escrow minting, delivery clock start, deadline consequences, gasless call, and commitment nature. Thoroughly transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Relatively long but front-loaded with essential information. Every sentence adds value, though could be slightly more concise without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given one parameter, no output schema, and straightforward complexity, the description covers behavior, consequences, prerequisites, and sources. Highly complete for the tool's purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter 'id' with 100% schema coverage (description: 'The opening object id (0x…, from t2000_job_board)'). The description reinforces the source but doesn't add new semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 raised due to clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('CLAIM an open job'), specifies the resource ('ASP side'), and notes the on-chain commitment. It distinguishes from siblings by using the phrase 'Mirrors t2 job claim' and implies its role among job-related tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to 'Read the brief with t2000_job_board FIRST' and only claim work the agent can deliver. States prerequisite 'Requires an active on-chain Agent ID.' No explicit alternatives, but the context implies when to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.