Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to uae-einvoice-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to validate e-invoices from Malaysia, Dominican Republic, Nigeria, Bolivia, and Costa Rica against official tax rules before submission, returning structured reports on structure, signatures, and business rule compliance.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Validates EU electronic invoices (Peppol, XRechnung, FatturaPA, etc.) and explains validation error codes, enabling AI coding agents to check invoice validity and get fixes before rejection.
      3
      38 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      InvoiceXML brings e-invoice compliance to your AI agent. Create, validate, convert, render, and extract structured invoices across UBL (Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, used worldwide), CII, Factur-X, ZUGFeRD, and XRechnung, all checked against the EN 16931 standard and official Schematron rules. Ask your assistant to generate a compliant invoice, validate one for errors, or convert between formats, with n
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Validates EU, UK, and AU VAT numbers against live sources and uses AI pattern analysis to detect invoice fraud.
      28 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Validates electronic invoices (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD, Factur-X, Peppol BIS, etc.) against authority-pinned rules and explains failures.
      2
      151 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct actions: TRN lookup, invoice validation, field-matrix checking, XML generation, and requirements lookup. The only potential confusion is between check_invoice_compliance and check_pint_ae_fields, but the descriptions explicitly differentiate structural checks from the full 51-field matrix.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a consistent lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern: lookup_, check_, check_, generate_, get_. The only minor inconsistency is using both 'lookup' and 'get' for retrieval actions, but the overall pattern is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a UAE e-invoicing helper server. Each tool covers a distinct need without redundancy, and the count feels appropriate for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers TRN validation, compliance checking, field-matrix evaluation, XML generation, and regulatory requirements lookup, which forms a coherent workflow. Minor gaps exist, such as no live FTA register lookup or explicit support for more advanced invoice operations, but the core e-invoicing lifecycle is reasonably complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues