get_request_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states it gets details, missing any mention of side effects, permissions, or error behavior. Does not disclose whether it reads or modifies state, though read-only is reasonable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose and contents, no extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lists key return fields (headers, request body, response body, timing) despite no output schema. Lacks format specification but sufficient for a detail retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear description referencing get_network_requests. Tool description adds no additional parameter details beyond schema, but baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly defines the tool as retrieving full details of a captured request, specifying contents: headers, request body, response body, timing. Distinguishes from sibling tools like get_network_requests and search_network.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage after obtaining a request ID from get_network_requests, but no explicit when-to-use, exclusions, or comparisons to alternatives like search_network.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.