vibeside_cluster_dispatch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses parallelism and the worker-pool execution model, which is useful, but says nothing about partial-failure semantics, result ordering, error propagation, or resource limits — significant gaps for a fan-out dispatch tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence naming the operation, the batch nature, the supported actions, and the execution substrate. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for invocation since the schema is fully documented, but with no annotations and no output schema the description should explain what comes back from a batch (results per task, failure handling) and any operational preconditions. It leaves those for the agent to discover.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and each task field, plus concurrency and autoScale, is documented in the schema itself. The description adds no parameter-level detail beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Dispatch) and resource (batch of parallel browser tasks), and enumerates the action types the batch supports. The 'batch/parallel/worker pool' framing distinguishes it from single-task siblings like vibeside_navigate or vibeside_eval, though it never names them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use batch dispatch versus the individual single-task siblings, nor prerequisites such as needing a running cluster or spawned browsers. The only implied usage signal is 'batch of parallel tasks' from the wording itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.