get_string
Retrieve the value of a string key from Redis. Use this to fetch stored string data.
Instructions
Get the value of a string key.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes |
Retrieve the value of a string key from Redis. Use this to fetch stored string data.
Get the value of a string key.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not disclose behavior such as what is returned, error handling for missing keys, or any side effects. With no annotations, the description fails to convey that this is a safe read operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short, which is concise, but it sacrifices informative content. It is not verbose, but it could be more useful without adding many words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of the domain (many sibling tools, no output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain the behavior in the context of Redis key-value operations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the description adds no meaning beyond the schema. The single 'key' parameter is merely restated, providing no additional context or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the resource ('string key'), distinguishing it from siblings like get_set or set_string. It is specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_set, get_hash). It does not mention that it only works for string keys or what happens if the key is of a different type.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/minivv/redis-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server