asana-local-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to asana-local-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Asana API that allows AI agents to read and optionally write to Asana tasks, comments, and custom fields, with tiered access controls and no delete tools.837 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables to interact with Asana through Claude, with read and write tools for tasks, projects, tags, and custom fields, with no destructive operations.37 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenancePerform Asana operations from an MCP Client such as Anthropic's Claude Desktop Application, and many more.222,237 npm148MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceGives local coding agents safe, read-only access to an existing Jira instance through MCP over stdio, keeping Jira credentials out of the LLM. It exposes tools for reading issues, comments, linked items, JQL search results, assigned open issues, and project metadata.6MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Asana through natural language, supporting task and project management via MCP clients like Claude.26MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes the full Asana REST API via an MCP server, enabling operations like task management and workspace queries, with configurable safety guardrails.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct resource and action: projects, tasks, task comments, project-scoped comments, and attachments. The two comment tools are separated by scope (single task vs. selected projects), so an agent should be able to select the correct one.
All tool names use lowercase snake_case with an action-plus-noun pattern like list_projects, search_tasks, get_task, and get_attachment. The naming is consistent and predictable.
Six tools is a well-scoped size for a focused read/search integration. Each tool has a distinct purpose and none feel redundant or extraneous.
For the apparent read-only/local-search purpose, the major Asana resources are covered: projects, tasks, comments, and attachments, with reasonable retrieval chains. The main limitation is the lack of any create/update/delete tools, which would be a gap if full Asana lifecycle management were expected.