Get Novel By Name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of explaining behavior. It does disclose the return contents (book_id and first chapter) and implies a read/search operation, but it does not clarify matching semantics such as exact name, partial match, or case sensitivity, nor does it mention failure behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the 'Quick search' purpose and packs the key return information into minimal words. There is no filler or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with an output schema available, the description covers the core invocation and return behavior adequately. The main gap is the lack of guidance on how this differs from sibling search tools, but the low complexity reduces the need for extensive context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the parameter is already described as 'Novel name to search for'. The description's 'by name' phrasing adds little beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool finds a novel by name and returns a book_id along with the first chapter. It is specific about the resource and outcome, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself from the sibling search_novels tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'Quick search' hints at a simple lookup, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus search_novels or get_novel_info. No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned, leaving the routing decision to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.