LuckyCola MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LuckyCola MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive image editing operations including resizing, format conversion, cropping, compression, rotation, flipping, and batch processing. Supports JPEG, PNG, WebP, and AVIF formats with quality control and metadata extraction.810 npm19MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides 80+ image processing tools including AI generation, background removal, upscaling, local manipulation, and diagram rendering, all with built-in cost tracking and health monitoring.34 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables multimodal AI capabilities through GLM-4.5V API for image processing, visual querying with OCR/QA/detection modes, and file content extraction from various formats including PDFs, documents, and images.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to inspect, convert, resize, compress, crop, rotate, watermark, background-remove, and batch-process images with secure path confinement and result verification.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal image processing MCP server providing background removal, stock media search, resize, format conversion, and collage creation.5MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered image editing such as upscaling, background removal, restoration, colorization, denoising, and compression through a simple API.90MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: checkImage handles image content compliance, fileOperation manages file system operations, and getFoodMenu retrieves recipe information. The domains (image moderation, file management, cooking) are completely separate, eliminating any risk of tool misselection.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (checkImage, getFoodMenu, fileOperation), with all tools using camelCase. The only minor deviation is that fileOperation uses 'Operation' as a noun rather than a specific resource, but this is still readable and maintains overall consistency.
With only 3 tools, the count feels thin for a server that appears to cover multiple unrelated domains (image moderation, file operations, and cooking). While each tool is distinct, the set lacks cohesion and might suggest an overly broad or poorly scoped server purpose, making it borderline appropriate.
There are significant gaps in coverage for each implied domain. For image moderation, there's no tool to upload or modify images. For file operations, basic CRUD is covered but lacks listing or searching. For cooking, there's no way to create or update recipes. The surface is incomplete, likely causing agent failures in extended workflows.