list_schemas
List all schemas in a specified database and retrieve object counts for each schema.
Instructions
List all schemas in a database with object counts
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| database | No | Database name |
List all schemas in a specified database and retrieve object counts for each schema.
List all schemas in a database with object counts
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| database | No | Database name |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states it lists schemas with counts. It does not disclose permissions required, whether it modifies data, or handle large results. Minimal behavioral disclosure beyond function name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with key information. No wasted words. Could benefit from additional context, but remains concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema provided; description partially addresses return by mentioning object counts. Missing details on ordering, pagination, or error cases. Adequate for a simple list tool but could be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
One parameter 'database' with description 'Database name' is already in schema. Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline 3. Description adds no extra context beyond what schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool lists all schemas in a database with object counts. Verb and resource are explicit, and it differentiates from sibling tools like list_tables and list_databases.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_schema_overview or list_databases. The description does not mention prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/millelog/sql-server-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server