ig_delete_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description discloses the critical behavioral trait of irreversibility. It does not cover other potential traits like permission requirements, rate limits, or effects on replies, but the core destructive nature is clearly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences (10 words total). It front-loads the action and includes only essential information: what the tool does and the key behavioral note about irreversibility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description adequately covers purpose and a key behavioral trait. It could be improved by specifying ownership requirements or error conditions, but it is largely sufficient for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers the single parameter comment_id with 100% description coverage. The tool's description adds only the context that it is a comment deletion and that the action is irreversible, which adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'a comment from your media post', making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It distinguishes itself from siblings like ig_hide_comment (reversible) and ig_get_comment (read-only).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides implicit usage guidance by noting irreversibility, suggesting caution. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like ig_hide_comment, nor does it mention prerequisites such as ownership of the media.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.