indexing_batch_publish

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the tool handles updates and removals (destructive behavior) and sets a limit of 100 notifications. However, it omits authentication needs, rate limits, or error handling, leaving gaps in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no redundant information. Every word adds value, front-loading the purpose and key constraint.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the main action and batching aspect, but with no output schema, it lacks details about return values, error handling, or prerequisites like site ownership verification.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions for all properties. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, essentially restating that it combines up to 100 notifications. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'notify' and resource 'Google about multiple URL updates or removals', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like indexing_publish (single notification) and indexing_get_metadata (metadata retrieval).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states the tool is for batching up to 100 notifications for efficiency, providing clear context for when to use it. However, it does not mention when not to use it or explicitly name alternatives like indexing_publish for single notifications.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.