cws-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cws-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for browser automation (Playwright + CDP + CLI) and bookmark management across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Brave, including cross-browser sync, deduplication, and a React dashboard.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Chrome extension testing. Access chrome.storage, Service Workers, declarativeNetRequest, and more directly from AI coding agents like Claude Code.2301MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA universal browser automation MCP server using Playwright, enabling programmatic control of Chrome with 63 tools for navigation, interaction, media control, and CDP-based diagnostics.639 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP server for persistent Chrome automation with multi-profile support, enabling tab management, page inspection, element interaction, JavaScript evaluation, and screenshots while preserving login sessions across restarts.82 npm3MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnterprise web automation testing MCP server that controls local Chrome via Playwright CDP, providing tools for page element analysis, interaction, dynamic layer exploration, VTable scene graph, test recording, and Shadcn-style Excel export.24-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that lets agents drive your real Chrome browser with existing logins and sessions via an outbound-only WebSocket extension. It exposes Playwright-compatible browser tools for navigation, clicking, typing, and snapshots.1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but update-metadata and update-metadata-ui both update metadata via different methods, which could cause confusion. The descriptions help differentiate, but an agent might still misselect.
Tool names consistently use lowercase with hyphens, but there is a mix of verbs (cancel, publish, upload) and nouns (status, deploy-percentage). The hyphenation pattern is consistent.
8 tools cover the core operations for Chrome Web Store item management without being overwhelming. The count is well-scoped for the server's purpose.
The set covers publishing workflow well, but misses important operations: creating new items (must use dashboard), listing items, and deleting. These gaps could hinder agents needing full lifecycle management.