TeslaMate MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to TeslaMate MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables reading Tesla vehicle data from a TeslaMate PostgreSQL database, including status, trips, charging, efficiency, weather integration, and more, via 38 tools for MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to safely interact with PostgreSQL databases, perform queries, inspect schemas, and analyze query performance.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to securely query and modify PostgreSQL databases, supporting SQL queries, table management, and schema inspection.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with PostgreSQL databases through natural language queries, schema inspection, and safe SQL execution.91-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to execute SQL queries and inspect PostgreSQL database schema.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with PostgreSQL databases using natural language queries, providing secure read-only access to database schemas and SQL translation capabilities.612-
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a specific metric or report (charging, efficiency, battery, driving, locations, etc.), and the descriptions are clear. However, a few tools like get_daily_driving_patterns and get_drive_summary_per_day could seem overlapping at first glance, though they cover different time granularities and aspects.
All 18 tools follow a strict get_<metric> naming convention with no deviations. The pattern is uniform and predictable, making it easy to understand the tool set at a glance.
With 18 tools, the server is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the count is justified by the breadth of Tesla telemetry data covered. Each tool provides a distinct report, and there are no obvious redundant tools.
The server covers a wide range of analytics and summarization reports for vehicle data. As a read-only reporting server, it lacks action-based tools, which is acceptable. Some minor gaps exist, such as raw individual charging/driving sessions, but comprehensive summaries and trends are provided.