Skip to main content
Glama
mikey-semy

plane-mcp

by mikey-semy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to plane-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Plane

      Ruben-Alvarez-Dev
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Plane project management platform providing 56 tools for workspaces, projects, issues, comments, cycles, modules, and more.
      -

    • Plane MCP Server

      devTowsif
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Plane project management APIs, offering tools for managing projects, work items, cycles, modules, initiatives, and more through MCP.
      MIT

    • plane-mcp

      bhflm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for a self-hosted Plane instance that exposes tickets, cycles, modules, labels, and states as MCP tools with both read and mutation capabilities.
      15 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by resource type (labels, states, issues, etc.), but `get_issue_using_readable_identifier` and `get_issue_details_by_readable_id` overlap heavily, both retrieving issues via readable identifiers with only slight input differences. This ambiguity could cause an agent to pick the wrong one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_labels, create_issue, delete_cycle). Minor deviations like `get_issue_details_by_readable_id` and singular/plural mismatches (delete_module_issue vs add_module_issues) prevent a perfect score.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 49 tools, the server is far above the 25+ threshold, making it unwieldy for agents to discover and select tools. Even for a broad project management domain, the count feels excessive and could benefit from consolidation.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides full CRUD for issues, labels, states, issue types, modules, cycles, and worklogs, covering core workflows well. Some gaps exist, such as no update/delete for projects and no single-project getter, but these are minor and workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources