Skip to main content
Glama
mikemc
by mikemc

twist_threads_mark_unread_for_others

Mark a Twist thread as unread for other users to ensure important messages receive attention. Specify a message index or mark the entire thread unread.

Instructions

Marks the thread as being unread for others.

Args: id: The id of the thread obj_index: The index of the last unread message. A value of -1 marks the whole thread as unread

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
obj_indexYes

Implementation Reference

  • The MCP tool handler function that executes the logic for marking a thread as unread for others by calling the Twist API.
    def twist_threads_mark_unread_for_others(
        ctx: Context,
        id: int,
        obj_index: int
    ) -> str:
        """Marks the thread as being unread for others.
    
        Args:
            id: The id of the thread
            obj_index: The index of the last unread message. A value of -1 marks the whole thread as unread
        """
        all_params = locals()
        token = ctx.request_context.lifespan_context.twist_token
        params = {k: v for k, v in all_params.items() if k != 'ctx' and v is not None}
    
        try:
            logger.info(f"Marking thread with ID: {id} as unread for others from comment index: {obj_index}")
            twist_request("threads/mark_unread_for_others", params=params, token=token, method="POST")
            logger.info(f"Successfully marked thread with ID: {id} as unread for others")
            return f"Successfully marked thread with ID: {id} as unread for others from comment index: {obj_index}"
        except Exception as error:
            logger.error(f"Error marking thread as unread for others: {error}")
            return f"Error marking thread as unread for others: {str(error)}"
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the action ('marks as unread') but lacks critical behavioral details: required permissions (e.g., admin rights), whether it's reversible, rate limits, or what 'for others' entails (e.g., all users or specific groups). The description is minimal and doesn't compensate for the absence of annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose in the first sentence, followed by parameter details in a structured 'Args:' section. It's efficient with minimal waste, though the parameter explanations could be slightly more detailed without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and 2 parameters with 0% schema coverage, the description is moderately complete. It covers the purpose and parameter basics but lacks behavioral context (e.g., permissions, effects) and output details. For a mutation tool affecting others, this is a significant gap, though the parameter semantics help.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds meaningful semantics for both parameters: 'id' as the thread identifier and 'obj_index' with specific behavior ('-1 marks the whole thread as unread'). This clarifies usage beyond the bare schema, though it could explain 'obj_index' values more fully (e.g., positive indices).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('marks') and resource ('the thread') with a specific scope ('as being unread for others'), which distinguishes it from similar tools like 'twist_threads_mark_unread' that likely affect only the current user. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from all sibling tools beyond this implied distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'twist_threads_mark_unread' or 'twist_threads_clear_unread'. It mentions the effect ('for others') but doesn't specify use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer context from tool names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mikemc/twist-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server