Met Museum MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Met Museum MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI assistants manage an art catalogue — find paintings, post to social media, upload to galleries, schedule posts, and update metadata.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying the Victoria and Albert Museum (V\&A) collections via natural language or direct tool calls.5 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for searching museum collections and viewing artwork images and metadata from multiple museums, including the Met, Art Institute of Chicago, Rijksmuseum, and more.247 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Solid protocol enabling AI models to read, write, search, and manage resources in Solid pods.1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA server that provides access to the Art Institute of Chicago Collection through natural language interactions. This server allows AI models to search the Art Institute of Chicago Collection and have art works available as a Resource.69 npm5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for IIIF integration, enabling image fetching, manifest exploration, annotation search, and authentication support for cultural heritage resources.112MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get-museum-object retrieves details by ID, list-departments lists departments, open-met-explorer launches an interactive app, and search-museum-objects performs filtered searches. There is no ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with lowercase hyphens (e.g., get-museum-object, list-departments). No mixing of styles.
Four tools is an appropriate count for a museum collection server covering search, detail retrieval, department listing, and an interactive explorer. Not too sparse or overwhelming.
The tool surface covers key read operations (search, detail, departments) and an interactive explorer. Minor gaps like direct department-based object listing are covered by search filters, so no significant missing functionality.