Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to artic-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching artworks, artists, and exhibitions from the Art Institute of Chicago collection via natural language, returning detailed artwork information, artist biographies, and exhibition status through the ARTIC public API.
      121 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A MCP Server that lets user ask AI models to discover the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Adds the discovered art works as Resources on the server.
      4
      242 npm
      35
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search and explore over 570,000 artworks from the Metropolitan Museum of Art and Art Institute of Chicago without needing an API key.
      9
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for searching museum collections and viewing artwork images and metadata from multiple museums, including the Met, Art Institute of Chicago, Rijksmuseum, and more.
      2
      4
      7 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      This server enables AI models to access the Städel Museum's digital collection via OAI-PMH, allowing harvesting of records, retrieval of multilingual metadata, and fetching of high-resolution images.
      4
      2
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants manage an art catalogue — find paintings, post to social media, upload to galleries, schedule posts, and update metadata.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: full-text-search covers general metadata, while search-by-title, search-by-medium, and search-for-artist target specific fields. However, full-text-search and search-by-title could be confused since titles are part of metadata, but descriptions clarify the distinction. Get-artwork-by-artist and get-artwork-by-id are clearly different operations.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: search-by-title, search-by-medium, and search-for-artist follow a consistent verb-noun pattern, but full-text-search uses a hyphenated adjective-noun style, and get-artwork-by-artist/get-artwork-by-id use a verb-noun-by-noun pattern. This inconsistency makes the set less predictable, though all names remain readable and descriptive.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, this is well-scoped for querying an art collection. It covers key search dimensions (title, medium, artist, full-text) and specific retrieval (by ID, by artist), without being overwhelming. Each tool earns its place by addressing a distinct aspect of the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides strong coverage for searching and retrieving artworks and artists, with pagination support across most tools. A minor gap is the lack of tools for filtering by other common attributes like date, genre, or location, but agents can work around this using the existing search tools. Core workflows for exploration and lookup are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues