mutual-review-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| COST_LOG_PATH | No | Path to cost log output file | OS-dependent |
| OPENAI_API_KEY | No | Required OpenAI API key | |
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | No | Required Anthropic API key | |
| ENABLE_COST_TRACKING | No | Set to '1' or 'true' to enable cost tracking logging | 0 |
| MUTUAL_REVIEW_CONFIG | No | Path to JSON config file as alternative to API key environment variables | OS-dependent |
| MUTUAL_REVIEW_GPT_MODEL | No | GPT model name | gpt-4o |
| MUTUAL_REVIEW_CLAUDE_MODEL | No | Claude model name | claude-sonnet-4-6 |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| review_fileA | Mutual code review on a file. Claude and GPT-4o each review independently, then Claude synthesizes the findings. |
| review_codeA | Mutual code review on a code snippet. Claude and GPT-4o each review independently, then Claude synthesizes. |
| review_diffB | Mutual code review on a unified diff string. Pass the diff text directly (no git invocation is performed). |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool targets a distinct input type (code snippet, diff string, file), with clear descriptions that prevent any ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using 'review_' prefix followed by the input type, making them predictable and easy to understand.
Three tools is perfectly scoped for a focused code review server, covering the essential input types without unnecessary bloat.
The tool set covers all common code review scenarios (snippet, diff, file), providing complete lifecycle coverage for the stated purpose.