Skip to main content
Glama
midodimori

gitlab-review-mcp

by midodimori
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to gitlab-review-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • GitLab MCP

      lvhungdev
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage GitLab projects by providing tools for issues, milestones, and team reports through a read/write interface. Users can interact with project data using natural language directly within Claude Desktop or Claude Code.
      -

    • GitLab MCP Server

      CarmeloRicarte
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with GitLab for managing projects, branches, issues, and merge requests. It provides tools for searching code and performing file operations like reading and writing directly within repositories.
      4 npm
      MIT

    • GitLab MR MCP

      kopfrechner
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with GitLab repositories, allowing them to manage merge requests and issues including listing projects, fetching MR details and diffs, adding comments, and updating MR titles and descriptions.
      14 npm
      94
      MIT

    • GitLab MCP Server

      TeslaLord
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with GitLab repositories through natural language, supporting project management, issue tracking, merge requests, file access, and repository operations. Includes a conversational agent interface with structured outputs for comprehensive GitLab workflow automation.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The tools are mostly distinct: retrieval, listing, commenting, and suggestion application each have clear targets. The only potential confusion is apply_suggestion vs apply_suggestions, but the singular/batch distinction is documented.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern with clear prefixes like get_, list_, search_, add_, update_, reply_, and apply_. The consistent structure makes the action and resource predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is within the ideal range for a focused GitLab MR review server. Each tool addresses a specific aspect of browsing, updating, or commenting on merge requests without bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core MR review workflow: fetching MRs/diffs/commits/comments, posting and updating comments, and applying suggestions. Missing capabilities like deleting comments, resolving threads, or approving MRs are minor gaps rather than fatal omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources