Skip to main content
Glama
microsoft

Microsoft Fabric RTI MCP Server

Official
by microsoft

Related Servers

Alternatives to Microsoft Fabric RTI MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Microsoft Fabric by exposing tools for managing workspaces, notebooks, SQL queries, pipelines, and Livy Spark sessions. It provides a comprehensive set of operations for data engineering and analytics tasks using standard Azure authentication.
      37
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables authorized AI agents to inspect, query, create, modify, validate, refresh, and manage eligible cloud semantic models in Microsoft Fabric and Power BI through stateless Streamable HTTP.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely connect to your own Power BI or Fabric tenant using your Azure identity, with tools to inspect workspaces and models, run read-only DAX, validate and deploy your own reports, take page screenshots, and enforce guardrails that protect shared resources.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Microsoft Fabric and Power BI services through the Model Context Protocol. Users can manage workspaces, execute DAX queries, refresh datasets, and create Fabric notebooks using natural language.
      6
      12 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to manage Microsoft Fabric workspaces, items, lakehouses, warehouses, and notebooks via the control plane, and run guarded read-only SQL plus optional DAX queries against semantic models.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 39 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by domain prefix and action, but there are several near-overlaps such as kusto_command vs kusto_show_command, eventstream_get_definition vs eventstream_get_current_definition, and eventstream_create vs eventstream_create_from_definition. Descriptions help clarify the intended use, but an agent could still plausibly select the wrong tool in these cases.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with domain prefixes like kusto_, eventstream_, map_, and activator_, and most follow a verb_noun pattern. Minor deviations such as kusto_known_services, kusto_diagnostics, and the overloaded eventstream_*_definition names keep it from being perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 39 tools, the server is heavily loaded and exceeds the 25-tool threshold for a typical MCP surface. The count reflects the broad Fabric RTI scope, but the toolset would be easier for agents to navigate if split into more focused servers per domain.

    Completeness3/5

    Kusto, Eventstream, and Map have strong coverage with querying, schema inspection, ingestion, lifecycle management, and definition editing. However, Activator is notably thin: only artifact listing and trigger creation exist, with no way to get, update, list, or delete existing triggers, leaving an obvious management gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSlow