Location Memory
Related Servers
Alternatives to Location Memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSelf-hosted semantic memory for AI agents. Save worklogs, decisions, and notes via MCP, then recall them across sessions by meaning rather than keyword. Backed by Postgres + pgvector with local embeddings (multilingual-e5-base).1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA personal memory MCP server that ingests AI agent conversation logs from multiple platforms into a searchable PostgreSQL+pgvector database, enabling cross-session recall of past reasoning and decisions.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-hostable MCP server that provides permanent memory for AI agents using Postgres + pgvector for semantic search and Markdown file sync.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePersonal digital memory: a desktop app that indexes your mail, chats, and documents into a local SQLite corpus on your machine — parsing and OCR run on-device via llama.cpp — and serves them to any MCP client. Local server on 127.0.0.1, plus an optional per-user remote endpoint (you.localkiagent.com) whose TLS terminates on your own device.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA local-first, privacy-first MCP server that passively indexes personal digital activity (screenshots, clipboard, notes, downloads, links) into a local database, enabling LLMs like Claude to access your context without cloud storage.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA private, local-first MCP server that gives any AI long-term memory — its own diary. Zero models, zero network, zero subscription; smarter search than Notion, running entirely on your machine.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct query: current location, stay lists, city/country rollups, place rankings, trip lists/details, people links, day timeline, stats, records, home timeline, data coverage, and raw SQL. The boundaries are clear from the descriptions, so an agent can reliably select the right tool.
Tool names are all snake_case and readable, but they mix simple nouns (stays, trips, day, home) with compound descriptors (cities_visited, who_was_there, location_coverage). There is no consistent verb_noun or prefix pattern, though this inconsistency does not prevent comprehension.
With 14 tools, the set is well-scoped for a location memory server. Each tool earns its place by covering a distinct query type, and the count falls within the ideal 3-15 range.
The tool surface is thoroughly complete for its domain: current status, lists, aggregates, details, stats, extremes, home timeline, coverage gaps, and a raw SQL escape hatch. There are no obvious dead ends for common location-history questions.