No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct signal: composer metadata (project_status), code quality (module_risk), CVEs (security_audit), newer releases (outdated_packages), version compatibility (check_updates), aggregation (upgrade_plan), batch triage (fleet_overview), and release notes (fetch_release_notes). Overlaps that do exist (check_updates vs outdated_packages vs security_audit all read composer.lock; upgrade_plan vs its component tools) are explicitly delineated in the descriptions. An agent can reliably tell which tool to call.
All names are snake_case and readable, but the pattern is not uniform verb_noun: project_status, module_risk, security_audit, outdated_packages, upgrade_plan, fleet_overview are noun phrases while check_updates and fetch_release_notes start with verbs. This is a minor stylistic deviation, not a confusing one, since the casing convention itself is consistent.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a Magento audit/upgrade-planning server. Each tool covers a distinct audit concern, and the aggregate tools (upgrade_plan, fleet_overview) justify their existence by composing the primitives for different scales (single project vs fleet).
The surface covers the full audit lifecycle: project metadata, code-quality static analysis, security advisories, outdated packages, version compatibility, release notes, a per-project upgrade verdict, and fleet triage. Failure modes are handled explicitly (scanned=false with reasons, unverified signals, per-project batch errors), leaving no obvious dead ends for the stated domain.