Skip to main content
Glama
michalhron

Scopus Plus MCP

by michalhron
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Scopus Plus MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Strato Scopus MCP

      stratosphereips
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects Scopus to AI assistants for literature discovery. Provides tools for finding papers, experts, citation networks, and analyzing research trends.
      2
      GPL 2.0

    • mcp-openalex

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search scholarly works, authors, institutions, venues, and concepts, retrieve detailed metadata, and explore citation networks through natural-language requests.
      151 npm
      MIT

    • Scopus MCP Server

      qwe4559999
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides access to the Elsevier Scopus API, enabling AI assistants to search for academic papers, retrieve detailed abstracts, and look up author profiles. It facilitates bibliometric research and scholarly data analysis through natural language commands.
      5
      107 PyPI
      44
      MIT

    • MCP-scopus

      andri-setiawan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and retrieve real academic papers from Scopus, preventing citation hallucination by providing accurate paper metadata, author info, and citation analysis.
      15
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct bibliometric operations, with descriptions that explain unique workflows. A few boundaries blur, especially job_status vs job_result and citation_lineage vs citation_network vs resolve_citers, but the detailed descriptions usually disambiguate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are consistently snake_case and mostly follow predictable verb_noun or resource-oriented phrasing. Minor deviations include acronym-style rpys and several noun-phrase analysis names, but overall the convention is readable and stable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 35 tools, the server exceeds the practical threshold where an agent can easily scan and select without overload. Although the domain is broad, many advanced analyses could be grouped or layered behind fewer entry points.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the research lifecycle well: search, identifier resolution, full-text retrieval, citation analysis, journal metrics, exports, imports, diagnostics, and background jobs. Only minor gaps remain, such as lack of direct document-level metrics or broader export/lifecycle operations, but these are generally workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources