Muiscan MCP Server
Converts Figma designs into production-ready MUI Design System web components by exporting layouts via the Muiscan Figma Plugin and transforming them into code
Translates design layouts into MUI (Michael UI) Design System web components, supporting comprehensive component sets including inputs, content, layout, feedback, actions, and navigation components
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Muiscan MCP Serverconvert this Figma button design to an MUI web component"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Muiscan MCP Server
Translate Figma files to MUI Design System components via the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
What is Muiscan?
Muiscan converts Figma designs into production-ready MUI (Michael UI) web components via the Model Context Protocol.
Related MCP server: MCP Figma to Code
Getting Started with MUI Design System
Before using Muiscan, set up your MUI project:
Create Mui App
Get started quickly with the official MUI starter template:
A lightweight starter template for building accessible, fast-loading interfaces using Mui Web Components.
# Clone the starter template
git clone https://github.com/michaeltrilford/create-mui-app.git
cd create-mui-app
npm install
npm startOnce you have your MUI project set up, you can use Muiscan to convert Figma designs directly into MUI components.
Installation
Clone or download this repository
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/muiscan-mcp.git cd muiscan-mcpInstall dependencies
npm installConfigure Claude Desktop Add the Muiscan server to your Claude Desktop configuration file:
macOS:
~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json
Windows:%APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonAdd this configuration (update the path to match your installation):
{ "mcpServers": { "muiscan": { "command": "node", "args": ["/Users/AddYourPath/muiscan-mcp/server.js"] } } }Restart Claude Desktop After saving the configuration, restart Claude Desktop for the changes to take effect.
Usage
Once installed, Muiscan provides:
Tools
translate_muiscan: Transform muiscan JSON to web components
Prompts
mui-component-guide: Guide for converting UI to MUI web components
In Claude Desktop
Open Claude Desktop
Go to Settings → Tools and MCP
Verify that "Muiscan" appears in your MCP servers list
Export from Figma:
Open your design in Figma
Select the frame/component you want to convert
Run the Muiscan Figma Plugin to copy the layout
Convert in Cursor or play.muibook.com:
Paste the scanned layout into your prompt
Ask the model/prompt to convert it to MUI web components
The MCP will use the component guide to generate the code
Complete Workflow
Figma Design
↓
Muiscan Figma Plugin (Export)
↓
MUISON JSON (Copy to clipboard)
↓
Paste into Cursor or play.muibook.com
↓
Muiscan MCP (Transform)
↓
MUI Web ComponentsSupported Components
Muiscan supports a comprehensive set of MUI components including:
Inputs: field, checkbox, input, select, switch, file-upload, progress
Content: accordion, heading, body, code, dialog, drawer, quote, slat, smart-card, table, image, list
Layout: card, container, responsive, rule, v-stack, h-stack, grid
Feedback: alert, badge, message, loader
Actions: button, button-group, chip, dropdown, link
Navigation: carousel-controller, stepper, tab-controller, tab-bar
Project Structure
muiscan-mcp/
├── server.js # Main MCP server
├── mui-prompts.js # Component guide and examples
├── transform.js # JSON transformation logic
├── mcp.json # Server configuration
├── package.json # Node.js dependencies
└── README.md # This fileDevelopment
To test the server locally:
npm startTroubleshooting
Server not appearing in Claude Desktop
Check that the path in
claude_desktop_config.jsonis correctVerify Node.js is installed:
node --versionRestart Claude Desktop completely
Check Claude Desktop logs for errors
Changes not taking effect
Save all configuration files
Fully quit and restart Claude Desktop (not just close the window)
Clear any cached MCP connections
License
MIT
Contributing
Contributions welcome! Please open an issue or submit a pull request.
Available Tools
1 tooltranslate_muiscanC
Transform muiscan JSON to web components
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| json | Yes | The muiscan JSON to transform |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states 'Transform' but doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether it's read-only, destructive, requires authentication, or has rate limits. This leaves significant gaps in understanding the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste, clearly front-loading the purpose. It's appropriately sized for a simple tool, making it easy to parse without unnecessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and a transformation tool, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on what the transformation entails, the format of web components produced, error handling, or any behavioral context, making it inadequate for full understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents the 'json' parameter fully. The description adds no additional meaning beyond implying the input is muiscan JSON, which aligns with the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema handles parameter documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Transform') and the resource ('muiscan JSON to web components'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from siblings (none exist) or specify what 'muiscan JSON' is, which slightly limits specificity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, such as prerequisites, alternatives, or context. With no siblings, it's the only option, but it lacks any usage instructions or exclusions, leaving the agent without operational context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
1 tool update
- First observed
translate_muiscan
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool has a distinct and clear purpose, making it impossible for an agent to misselect between multiple options.
Since there is only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name 'translate_muiscan' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and there are no other tools to cause inconsistency or deviation.
A single tool is too few for most server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. While it might be appropriate for a highly specialized task, it feels thin and incomplete for general use, indicating a potential mismatch with typical MCP server expectations.
The tool surface is severely incomplete, as it only offers one transformation function without any related operations. There are obvious gaps, such as no ability to create, update, delete, or retrieve muiscan data, making it impossible for agents to perform a full workflow or lifecycle in this domain.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
The Figma MCP server brings Figma design context directly into your AI workflow.
UI design from prompts, screenshots, and URLs for AI coding agents and theme tokens.
- miromiroOAuthapp.miromiro
Turn any live website into brand colors, fonts, design tokens, SVGs, Lottie and paste-ready code.
Build and manage your design system with AI: tokens, themes, components, icons, Figma and code.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConverts Figma designs into production-ready React components with design token extraction, widget registry integration, and micro-frontend module generation.356 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceTransform Figma designs into pixel-perfect React + Tailwind components using the Model Context Protocol.508 npm5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceConverts Figma designs into structured code context with token-aware styling, enabling AI agents to generate production-level frontend code.17 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read and write Figma designs through a local WebSocket relay, turning Figma selections into framework-aware code and building/editing designs directly on the canvas. Provides 112 MCP tools for bidirectional design-code workflows with support for any MCP client.MIT