Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-notes

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local note-taking server that provides intelligent management of markdown files through hybrid keyword and AI-powered semantic search. It enables users to create, find, and retrieve notes using advanced indexing, vector embeddings, and a built-in web viewer.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Git-backed MCP server for creating and maintaining an Obsidian-style markdown knowledge base with full CRUD, search, and git sync.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Serves a git-backed folder of Markdown notes over MCP so AI agents can search, read, write, move and delete them, with every write recorded as a git commit attributed to the calling client. Supports full-text section search with snippets, wikilinks and typed relations, LFS-backed searchable attachments, optimistic concurrency for multiple agents, and per-client token or OAuth 2.1 access.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI clients to read and write a self-hosted, git-backed graph of team memory nodes — searching, creating, updating, linking, and tracing the history of notes about what exists, its state, and what was done — over MCP (stdio or HTTP) or a plain REST API. Combines lexical and semantic search in an embedded index, so it works model-agnostically and even fully offline.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Headless semantic MCP server for Obsidian, Logseq, Dendron, Foam, and any markdown folder. Features built-in hybrid semantic search, surgical AST editing, template scaffolding, zero-config local embeddings, and workflow tracking.
      5
      60 npm
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides semantic search and a tag-based knowledge graph for any project, auto-discovering local markdown knowledge bases with YAML frontmatter.
      10
      4 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 38 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tool purposes are largely distinct and grouped by domain (notes, facts, glossary), with clear CRUD/search/maintenance roles. The only mild ambiguity is among fact retrieval options (query_facts/list_facts/search_facts) and the several fact-source integrity helpers, though their descriptions are specific enough for careful agents.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Names consistently use snake_case verb-first patterns (create_note, delete_fact, merge_tags, search_glossary). Minor deviations like add_facts_batch, lookup_term, and get_facts_with_stale_sources slightly break the otherwise predictable verb_noun rhythm, and retrieval verbs (list/query/search/find) are not perfectly standardized.

    Tool Count2/5

    38 tools is well above the heavy threshold and will impose a real selection burden on agents. While the breadth reflects three subdomains plus maintenance features, several clusters (source-integrity tools, index/reindex tools, graph traversal) could be consolidated without losing core capability.

    Completeness4/5

    Notes, facts, and glossary all have full lifecycle coverage, plus search, history/restore, graph traversal, and integrity checks. Minor gaps exist—no explicit tag/category deletion, no direct source-record editing—but agents can work around them through update_note and revalidate/source tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive