Skip to main content
Glama
michaelfeng

FactorHub MCP Server

by michaelfeng
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to FactorHub MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • akshare-mcp

      sciciv
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants direct, structured access to China A-share market data.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • qlib-mcp

      lsj210001
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for the Microsoft Qlib quantitative research platform that enables AI agents to perform financial data queries, factor analysis, and strategy backtesting. It supports A-share and US stock markets through Qlib expressions and built-in analytical tools.
      3
      MIT

    • HTZL A Share MCP

      mm2xai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing 29 A-share analysis skills including real-time data, capital flow, limit-up tracking, technical/fundamental analysis, backtesting, risk control, and Xueqiu portfolio tracking, enabling AI agents to execute market research and strategy tasks.
      Apache 2.0

    • sfc-data-mcp

      yangxinagfeng123
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps SFC financial data API into 32 tools for comprehensive A-share market data, including real-time quotes, rankings, limit-up statistics, news, themes, financials, charts, research reports, and watchlists.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of financial data analysis: factor performance vs scores, index vs stock data, stock info vs list, valuation, backtesting, and configuration. No two tools serve the same purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., get_factor_nav, list_factors, run_backtest). The conventions are uniform across all 11 tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, the server covers core operations for factor analysis, stock data, index data, backtesting, and configuration. The count is well-scoped without being overwhelming or insufficient.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers essential CRUD-like operations for factor data, stocks, indices, and backtesting. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of bulk data retrieval or more customizable backtest parameters, but the core workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources