Memory MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Memory MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides Claude with long-term memory by indexing conversation history, enabling semantic search, decision tracking, and cross-project search.18 npm29MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceGives Claude Code long-term memory that persists across sessions via hybrid BM25 and vector semantic search, with multi-project isolation.4 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a local long-term memory layer for AI coding tools like Cursor and Claude Code, enabling cross-session, cross-tool sharing of project facts, user preferences, decisions, and workflows.12 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code using local SQLite, semantic embeddings, and full-text search, enabling Claude to recall and retrieve context across sessions and projects without external services.8 npm4MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceProvides long-term memory and lossless context management for Claude Code, enabling automatic context compression, cross-session memory sharing, and semantic search across all history.10-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Claude with a persistent local memory and structured knowledge graph to track project states, tasks, and historical decisions across different chat sessions. It enables users to recall information using keyword relevance, time-travel queries, and dependency analysis for complex project management.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 56 tools
There are multiple tools for similar purposes (e.g., recall, recall_by_tag, recall_with_fallback; find_contradictions, get_contradictions, mark_contradiction), but descriptions help differentiate them. Some overlap exists, especially among recall variants and validation/invalidation tools.
Naming conventions are mixed: some use verb_noun (e.g., list_memories, link_memories), others are phrases or single verbs (e.g., remember, forget, hot_cache_status). While most are readable, the pattern is not uniform.
56 tools is excessive for a single server. Many tools are specialized variants or internal utilities (e.g., db_info, metrics_status) that could be consolidated. The high number makes the tool surface hard to navigate.
The tool set covers the full lifecycle of memory management: storage, recall, validation, relationships, contradictions, hot cache, sessions, mining, consolidation, and maintenance. Only minor gaps exist (e.g., batch operations on memories could be more explicit).