Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Memory MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides Claude with long-term memory by indexing conversation history, enabling semantic search, decision tracking, and cross-project search.
      18 npm
      29
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local long-term memory layer for AI coding tools like Cursor and Claude Code, enabling cross-session, cross-tool sharing of project facts, user preferences, decisions, and workflows.
      12 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides persistent, searchable memory for Claude Code using local SQLite, semantic embeddings, and full-text search, enabling Claude to recall and retrieve context across sessions and projects without external services.
      8 npm
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides long-term memory and lossless context management for Claude Code, enabling automatic context compression, cross-session memory sharing, and semantic search across all history.
      10
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides Claude with a persistent local memory and structured knowledge graph to track project states, tasks, and historical decisions across different chat sessions. It enables users to recall information using keyword relevance, time-travel queries, and dependency analysis for complex project management.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 56 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There are multiple tools for similar purposes (e.g., recall, recall_by_tag, recall_with_fallback; find_contradictions, get_contradictions, mark_contradiction), but descriptions help differentiate them. Some overlap exists, especially among recall variants and validation/invalidation tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Naming conventions are mixed: some use verb_noun (e.g., list_memories, link_memories), others are phrases or single verbs (e.g., remember, forget, hot_cache_status). While most are readable, the pattern is not uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    56 tools is excessive for a single server. Many tools are specialized variants or internal utilities (e.g., db_info, metrics_status) that could be consolidated. The high number makes the tool surface hard to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the full lifecycle of memory management: storage, recall, validation, relationships, contradictions, hot cache, sessions, mining, consolidation, and maintenance. Only minor gaps exist (e.g., batch operations on memories could be more explicit).

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessNo issues