Skip to main content
Glama
micaelmalta

MCP Datadog Server

by micaelmalta
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Datadog Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • datadog-mcp

      techskies11
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search logs, query metrics, manage dashboards, analyze APM traces, and control monitors via Datadog APIs.
      30
      MIT

    • Datadog MCP Server

      bhayanak
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Datadog's observability platform via natural language, covering metrics, logs, APM, monitors, dashboards, incidents, and infrastructure.
      663
      1
      MIT

    • DataDog MCP Server

      Believe-SA
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with DataDog's observability platform through a standardized interface. Supports monitoring infrastructure, managing events, analyzing logs and metrics, and automating operations like alerts and downtimes.
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Datadog Server

      ClaudioLazaro
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Datadog APIs through automatically generated tools from Postman collections. Supports monitoring operations, log management, metrics submission, and other Datadog functionality through natural language.
      100
      9
      Apache 2.0

    • Datadog MCP Server

      ppandrangi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Datadog APIs through natural language, supporting full CRUD operations on metrics, monitors, dashboards, logs, infrastructure, and more.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct, but the three service dependency tools (get_apm_service_dependencies, get_service_dependencies, get_service_dependencies_multi_env) have highly overlapping purposes and could be easily misselected by an agent. Other tools like list_metrics vs query_metrics are clearly separated, but the dependency trio introduces ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, search_, query_, aggregate_). The verbs are predictable and align with their actions. Minor deviation: get_ prefixes are used for both single items (get_metric_metadata) and collections (get_service_dependencies), but this is not overly confusing.

    Tool Count4/5

    16 tools is on the higher end of the recommended range, but it covers multiple Datadog features (metrics, logs, events, monitors, APM, dependencies) reasonably. Each tool serves a distinct function within these domains, so the count is justified, though it feels slightly heavy for a single server.

    Completeness3/5

    The set provides broad read-only coverage for Datadog's main observability areas, but it lacks any write operations (create, update, delete monitors, events, etc.). There are also gaps like dashboards and trace detail. The service dependency trio is overrepresented while monitor management is incomplete, leaving agents unable to perform lifecycle actions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources