Talk to Figma MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Talk to Figma MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- -licenseCqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Figma in real-time through a WebSocket connection. Supports comprehensive design operations including text manipulation, layouts, components, variables, and export functionality.72207 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEmpowers AI assistants to control Figma via natural language, enabling creation and modification of designs, components, variables, and exports through a WebSocket bridge.2,237 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude and Cursor to interact directly with Figma to create, modify, and analyze design elements in real-time. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for document inspection, styling, component management, and automated layout via a bidirectional WebSocket connection.365 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI agents like Claude to interact with Figma designs through 50+ tools for creating, styling, and manipulating design elements, components, and variables via a WebSocket relay and Figma plugin.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects AI agents to Figma through a local WebSocket bridge, enabling read/write access to open Figma files, node manipulation, and AI-assisted rename/group features.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceBridges AI clients to Figma Desktop via Plugin API and WebSocket, enabling real-time design manipulation without rate limits.1,065 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
There are redundant tools like get_selection and read_my_design which both retrieve selection info with unclear distinction. scan_text_nodes and scan_nodes_by_types also overlap, as you can filter by type. While most tools are distinct, these overlaps make misselection likely.
Most tool names follow a verb_noun pattern (get_, set_, create_, delete_, move_, etc.). A few outliers like read_my_design, get_figma_comments, and post_figma_comment break the convention slightly, but overall it's fairly consistent.
42 tools is excessive for the scope, with many granular variants (single vs multiple) that could be consolidated with parameters. Stub tools for comments add to the clutter, making it heavy and potentially overwhelming for agents.
The set covers many core Figma operations (read nodes, create shapes, edit layout, export), but lacks common operations like modifying text font properties, grouping nodes, deleting annotations, and comments are non-functional stubs. These gaps will require workarounds or cause failures.