resize_node
Resize a Figma node by providing its ID, new width, and height.
Instructions
Resize a node in Figma
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | Yes | The ID of the node to resize | |
| width | Yes | New width | |
| height | Yes | New height |
Resize a Figma node by providing its ID, new width, and height.
Resize a node in Figma
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| nodeId | Yes | The ID of the node to resize | |
| width | Yes | New width | |
| height | Yes | New height |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Resize a node' without explaining what happens to child nodes, constraints, units, or whether resizing is absolute.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is very concise. No wasted words, but could benefit from slight expansion for clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with three required parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it does not cover nuances like positive dimensions, in-place modification, or side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond what is already in the input schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb and resource ('Resize a node in Figma'). However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like move_node or clone_node, which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., move_node or set_layout_sizing). No context about prerequisites or postconditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mhue26/figma-mcp-hybrid'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server