x_get_tweet_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not explicitly state that it is a read-only operation or any security/rate-limit details. However, it adds some detail about content (text, media, interactions).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, concise, front-loaded with purpose. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has one param, no output schema, no annotations. Description covers main purpose but '互动数据' (interaction data) is vague; could specify metrics. Mostly complete for low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the single parameter tweet_url having a description. The tool description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb '获取' (get) and resource '单条推文的详细信息' (detailed info of a single tweet). It distinguishes from siblings like x_get_tweets (multiple tweets) and x_get_user_profile (user profile).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Context implies it's for a single tweet, but no when-not-to-use or alternative names given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.