Skip to main content
Glama
systemone-decision-mcp

systemone-decision-mcp

by mhiqrambg

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
SYSTEMONE_MODELNoModel id used by the decision endpoint. Without this, the server still runs using the rule-based engine.
SYSTEMONE_API_KEYNoBearer token for the OpenAI-style decision endpoint. Without this, the server still runs using the rule-based engine.
SYSTEMONE_ENDPOINTNoURL of the OpenAI-style decision endpoint, for example https://your-host/v1/your-route. Without this, the server still runs using the rule-based engine.
SYSTEMONE_NO_DOTENVNoSet to 1 to disable loading .env entirely.
SYSTEMONE_TIMEOUT_MSNoRequest timeout in milliseconds. Raise this value if requests time out.
SYSTEMONE_REQUIRED_ATNoScore cutoff at or above which a recommendation is marked as required.0.93
SYSTEMONE_MAX_QUESTIONSNoMaximum number of questions used in the second stage. Lower this value to shrink the second stage and reduce timeouts.
SYSTEMONE_DEFAULT_THRESHOLDNoDefault score threshold used when deciding whether a tool is recommended.0.80

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
systemone_decide_toolsA

Analyse a user task and recommend the most appropriate available MCP tools, with scores, priority tiers, and deterministic reasons. Call this before complex or multi-step tasks. Returns no recommendations when the task needs no external tool.

systemone_recommend_skillsA

Rank the skills discovered on disk against a task and return the ones worth loading, with their SKILL.md path and a reason. Only metadata is read, never the skill body. The agent still loads the skill itself.

systemone_analyze_taskA

Classify what a task requires (current information, documentation, repository access, files, computation, database, browser, literature) before deciding on tools. Cheap single-question-batch call.

systemone_check_tool_needB

Score a single tool against a task and say whether it clears its threshold. Use when the agent is unsure whether one specific MCP tool is worth calling.

systemone_audit_executionA

Compare the tools this server recommended with the tools the agent reports having executed. Returns utilisation, missed recommendations, and unexpected tools. This server cannot observe other MCP servers, so the execution list must be supplied.

systemone_evaluate_resultC

Report objective tool-usage metrics alongside explicit limitations. Task success is only reported when the user supplied an outcome; tool calls alone are never treated as proof of success.

systemone_get_catalogA

Return the tool catalog with resolved availability, the discovered skill index, and the OpenCode configuration sources that were read. Useful for explaining why a tool was not recommended.

systemone_refresh_catalogA

Re-read OpenCode MCP configuration, the tool catalog, settings, and the skill index. Never writes to OpenCode configuration and never overwrites user-written catalog metadata.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but decide_tools, analyze_task, and check_tool_need all sit in the task-to-tool decision space and could require a moment to distinguish. The descriptions do clarify their scopes, keeping the overlap manageable rather than confusing.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool uses the same systemone_ prefix followed by a snake_case verb_noun pattern. Names such as decide_tools, recommend_skills, analyze_task, and refresh_catalog are predictable and consistent.

Tool Count5/5

Eight tools is well scoped for a decision/recommendation server, and each tool earns its place. There is no obvious filler or missing core operation from a count perspective.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers task analysis, tool and skill recommendation, single-tool checking, execution auditing, result evaluation, and catalog inspection/refresh. Minor gaps exist around managing settings or thresholds directly, but the key lifecycle is covered and intentional limitations are documented.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues