mcp-gtm-ga4
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-gtm-ga4
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager with read and write access, providing 40 tools to manage GA4 reports, audiences, and GTM tags, triggers, and variables via natural language.40MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Google Tag Manager and Google Ads, enabling AI agents to audit, fix, and manage GTM containers and Google Ads campaigns programmatically.126 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP Server that provides a conversational interface to Google Tag Manager API, allowing users to manage tags, triggers, variables, and containers through natural language.-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for Google Tag Manager, GA4 Measurement Protocol, DataLayer schema validation, Meta CAPI auditing, and tracking code snippet generation.4-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Google Tag Manager API v2 that enables AI assistants to query GTM accounts, containers, tags, triggers, variables, and unpublished changes.242Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAutomates Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager setup, management, and health monitoring with blueprints, multi-environment support, and MCP tools for AI agents.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct GTM or GA4 resource/action: list/get operations are clearly separated by resource type, audit/consent and preview have unique purposes, and the two GA4 report tools are differentiated by live vs. historical data. No two tools appear to do the same thing.
Most tools consistently follow the gtm_<verb>_<object> pattern, with list and get verbs used predictably across resources. Minor deviations like gtm_get_client_context and gtm_preview, plus gtm_ga4_run_report vs. gtm_ga4_realtime_report, introduce slight inconsistency but the overall convention remains readable.
11 tools is a well-scoped size for a GTM/GA4 server covering listing, retrieval, auditing, preview, and reporting. Each tool has a clear purpose and the count does not feel bloated or insufficient.
The set covers the main read-only workflows for GTM inspection, consent auditing, preview URL generation, and GA4 reporting. Missing pieces like a get_trigger operation and write/management operations are minor relative to the apparent read-only/audit-focused intent.