librenms-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to librenms-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for LibreNMS network monitoring — query devices, alerts, sensors, ports, and more through AI assistants like Claude.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the FortiMonitor v2 monitoring API. 241 tools across 33 modules covering server management, outage monitoring, maintenance windows, metrics, notifications, cloud monitoring, SNMP, dashboards, reporting, and more. Unofficial community project, not affiliated with Fortinet. Python, MIT license, Docker and local deployment supported.3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with NetBox API, enabling users to query and manage NetBox resources such as devices through natural language.-
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA Python-based MCP server that enables querying Cisco's Meraki Dashboard API to discover, monitor, and manage Meraki environments.2245MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing OpenWISP network infrastructure, enabling AI assistants to control devices, templates, topologies, and RADIUS sessions via the OpenWISP REST API.9218 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverns and automates network monitoring across SolarWinds Orion and Paessler PRTG platforms with a unified MCP server, enabling querying, alert management, and governed writes with audit logging.42MIT
TDQS
Scored across 110 tools
Many tools target distinct resources and actions, and descriptions often clarify boundaries. However, several closely named tools such as device_ports vs device_ports_get, device_vlans vs switching_vlans, and the various alert/port_group tools can be confused, especially given the sheer number of options.
Names are all snake_case, but conventions vary: some use plural resource names (devicegroups_list) while related tools use singular (devicegroup_add), verb position shifts between resource_action and resource_subaction, and some tools omit verbs entirely.
With 110 tools, the surface is far beyond a well-scoped set. While LibreNMS is broad, this volume creates a sprawling API that is difficult for an agent to navigate and select from reliably.
Coverage is extensive across devices, ports, alerts, bills, locations, logs, services, health, inventory, routing, and more. Only minor gaps are apparent, such as limited port update fields beyond description or some missing niche lifecycle operations.