sylve-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sylve-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage virtualization, Active Directory, Windows hosts via WinRM, PostgreSQL databases, and shell/SSH environments through Model Context Protocol tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables interaction with Proxmox VE for managing VMs, containers, storage, and cluster resources via natural language through the Model Context Protocol.56MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to monitor and manage a Proxmox VE cluster, including cluster status, VM/container lifecycle, and node actions via MCP tools.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and automation agents to inspect Proxmox clusters, nodes, storage, containers, VMs, and recent events through the Proxmox VE API, with optional backup actions.5Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Proxmox VE clusters, LXC containers, snapshots, services, and Tailscale mesh status.71MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage a homelab by providing tools for Docker, Ollama, and system monitoring through the Model Context Protocol.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 38 tools
Most tools target a clearly distinct resource and action (VM, jail, ZFS, node, backup, replication, task). A few boundaries are blurry: VM/jail/ZFS snapshot tools overlap in concept, and sylve_api_call can duplicate nearly any operation, but the descriptions make the intended scope clear.
The sylve_ prefix and resource-based grouping are consistent across the set (sylve_vm_list, sylve_vm_show, sylve_jail_create, etc.). Minor deviations are the noun-only multi-action tools such as sylve_zfs_pool, sylve_vm_snapshot, and sylve_network_overview, which omit the verb but remain readable.
At 38 tools, the surface is heavy for a single MCP server and exceeds the typical comfortable range. While the domain is broad, several tools could be consolidated or scoped further, and the three api_* meta-tools plus multiple resource-specific lifecycle tools inflate the count.
Core lifecycle coverage is strong across VMs, jails, ZFS, backups, replication, tasks, and cluster/node operations. Minor gaps exist around explicit network mutation, user/context creation, and some fine-grained operations, but sylve_api_search/schema/call provide a workaround via the full Swagger surface.