Skip to main content
Glama
mgdsn

io.github.mgdsn/verify-api-mcp

by mgdsn
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to io.github.mgdsn/verify-api-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • CiteGuard

      Franksterino
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables per-claim citation verification for AI-generated text by fetching cited sources and judging whether they support the claim, with verdicts and evidence quotes.
      64 npm
      MIT

    • VerifyAPI MCP Server

      KyTheKitty
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents and clients to fact-check factual claims against live web sources, returning citable verdicts with source details and cryptographically signed receipts for downstream verification.
      1
      307 npm
      MIT

    • footnote

      adwitiyashukla
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify their own output mid-task by checking every claim against provided sources, returning supported, partial, unsupported, or contradicted verdicts with exact citations.
      MIT

    • verification-mcp

      guptaprakhariitr
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fact-check claims, verify citations, and check source freshness using Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crossref, and Wayback Machine.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools target entirely different objects: one verifies bibliographic citations and the other verifies URLs. There is no overlap or ambiguity about which tool to select for a given task.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow the exact same verb_noun snake_case pattern: verify_citation and verify_url. The naming is perfectly consistent and immediately communicates each tool's purpose.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is on the thin side for a server with the general purpose of 'verify'. However, each tool covers a distinct and meaningful verification type, so the count feels borderline rather than wasteful.

    Completeness5/5

    The citation tool covers existence, retraction status, and metadata matching, while the URL tool covers resolution, redirects, archive availability, and expected content. Together they provide thorough coverage of the stated verification domain with no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources