mcp-ovh-api
An MCP server that lets you inspect and manage OVHcloud Object Storage and its users/policies through curated tools (read-only by default, with optional write tools).
Auth status:
ovh_auth_statusreports live credentials, auth method, endpoint, default project/region, whether writes are enabled, and what config is missing.Meta: Identify the active account and auth method, list/get projects, and list/get storage regions.
Buckets: List buckets, get bucket details and lifecycle; with writes enabled, create/update buckets, set lifecycle, and delete lifecycle/bucket.
Objects: List objects and versions, get object metadata, and mint presigned URLs; with writes enabled, copy, delete, delete versions, and bulk-delete objects.
Users & S3 credentials: List/get project users and S3 credentials; with writes enabled, create users/credentials, reveal secrets, and delete them.
Policies: Get and preview storage policies; with writes enabled, set policies, grant bucket access, and provision S3 users using
write-only,read-only, orread-writepresets.Escape hatch:
ovh_requestcalls arbitrary OVH/1.0API paths (GET-only unless writes are enabled).
Provides tools for interacting with the OVHcloud API, focused on Object Storage: managing buckets, objects, project users, S3 credentials, and storage policies, with read-only operations by default and optional write tools.
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@mcp-ovh-apiList my OVHcloud object storage buckets"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
@mgcrea/mcp-ovh
A Model Context Protocol server for the OVHcloud API, focused on Object Storage: buckets, objects, project users, S3 credentials and the storage policies that tie them together.
The server is read-only by default. Mutating tools are not merely refused when writes are off — they are never registered, so an agent cannot call them at all.
Features
Curated tools over OVHcloud's
/1.0API with descriptions that spell out its traps (see Traps worth knowing).Read-only by default.
OVH_ALLOW_WRITES=1adds the write tools; the destructive ones then additionally require an explicitconfirm: trueon every call.All three OVH auth methods, picked automatically from whichever env vars are present: OAuth2 service account (recommended), application key + consumer key (SHA1-signed, with automatic clock-drift correction), or a static access token.
Policy presets — including
write-only, which OVH's own role shortcut does not offer.List results are summarized, and OVH's deprecated per-bucket
objects[]array (which embeds every object in the bucket) is suppressed on both ends.X-Ovh-QueryIDis surfaced on every error, because that is the first thing OVH support asks for.An
ovh_requestescape hatch for the rest of the API (GET-only unless writes are enabled).Native
fetch, no runtime dependencies beyond the MCP SDK and Zod.
Related MCP server: saveformedearai
Install
pnpm install
pnpm buildConfigure
Pick one auth method.
(A) OAuth2 service account — recommended
Create an IAM service account at https://www.ovh.com/manager/#/iam/service-account.
Attach an IAM policy granting it your public cloud project (for object storage:
publicCloudProject:apiovh:*on the project resource).Copy the client id and secret into
.env.
Tokens last an hour and are cached and refreshed ahead of expiry.
(B) Application key + consumer key
Create the triplet in one shot at https://eu.api.ovh.com/createToken/. The access rules you list there are fixed forever — a consumer key cannot be widened afterwards, so grant what you need up front:
GET /cloud/project/*
POST /cloud/project/*
PUT /cloud/project/*
DELETE /cloud/project/*
GET /meRequests are SHA1-signed over secret+consumerKey+METHOD+URL+BODY+TIMESTAMP. A clock more
than ~30s off OVH's fails every call with a misleading Invalid signature, so the server
probes /auth/time once at startup and corrects for the delta.
(C) Static access token
Set OVH_ACCESS_TOKEN and it is sent as Authorization: Bearer.
cp .env.example .envVariable | Required | Description |
| no |
|
| (A) | IAM service account. Their presence selects OAuth2. |
| (B) | Application key pair. |
| (B) | Consumer key issued alongside them. |
| (C) | Pre-minted bearer token. |
| no | Force |
| no | Default project — the 32-char hex |
| no | Default storage region, upper-case ( |
| no | Set to |
| no | Override the API base URL entirely. |
| no | Retry budget for 401 / 429 / 5xx. Defaults to |
| no | Refresh the OAuth2 token this long before expiry. Defaults to |
| no | Set to |
Run
pnpm start # speaks JSON-RPC over stdioWire into Claude Code
Add to .mcp.json (project) or ~/.claude.json (global):
{
"mcpServers": {
"ovh": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/mcp-ovh/dist/cli.js"],
"env": {
"OVH_CLIENT_ID": "...",
"OVH_CLIENT_SECRET": "...",
"OVH_CLOUD_PROJECT": "abcdef0123456789abcdef0123456789",
"OVH_REGION": "UK"
}
}
}
}Inspect the tools
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/cli.jsTraps worth knowing
All are baked into the tool descriptions, but they explain the shape of this server:
OVH has no bucket policies — only user policies. One raw JSON document per project user, and that document is the entire access-control surface. Setting a policy replaces everything that user could previously do, across all buckets.
A policy cannot restrict the bucket's owner. OVH falls back to ACLs and the owner holds
FULL_CONTROL: "if the user is the bucket owner and even if there is no explicit allow in the policy file, the user will be authorized." A restricted key must therefore belong to a new project user that did not create the bucket.ovh_provision_s3_userchecks the bucket'sownerIdand refuses when you point it at the owner.The same fallback applies per object. Whoever uploads an object owns it and gets
FULL_CONTROLon it through the object ACL. So merely omittings3:GetObjectdoes not stop an upload-only key from reading back everything it wrote — verified against the live API, where a bare allow-list policy happily served the key its own uploads while correctly denying every object someone else had uploaded. An explicitDenyis required, and it does beat the ACL. That is why thewrite-onlypreset ships aDenystatement rather than a bare allow-list.
Two smaller ones. s3:PutObject alone still permits blind overwrite of existing keys
inside the allowed prefix — a "write-only" key is not an append-only key, which is a good
reason to enable versioning on the bucket. And policy changes take up to ~30 seconds to
propagate: a probe run five seconds after ovh_set_storage_policy still shows the old
behaviour, which reads exactly like a policy that silently failed.
Tools
Every project-scoped tool takes an optional project, and every storage tool an optional
region, overriding OVH_CLOUD_PROJECT / OVH_REGION per call. Tools marked W exist
only when OVH_ALLOW_WRITES=1; those marked ⚠️ are destructive and additionally require
confirm: true.
Start with ovh_whoami. It reports which auth method is live, which account you are, and
the clock delta against OVH — which is what a 401 on the signature method is nearly always
about.
Area | Tools |
Meta |
|
Buckets |
|
Objects |
|
Users & keys |
|
Policies |
|
Escape hatch |
|
ovh_presign_object is the only way bytes move: the server never proxies object content, it
mints a time-limited presigned S3 URL instead. With writes off it signs GET only.
Policy presets
ovh_preview_policy, ovh_set_storage_policy and ovh_provision_s3_user share three
presets, all scopable to a key prefix:
Preset | Grants |
| Allow |
|
|
| both, plus |
OVH's built-in roles (admin, deny, readOnly, readWrite, via ovh_grant_bucket_access)
have no write-only equivalent — that is why the raw-policy path exists. The multipart pair is
included deliberately: every S3 SDK auto-switches to multipart above ~8-16MB, and without
abort/list a failed upload orphans parts the key holder cannot clean up and keeps paying for.
OVH validates policy actions against a fixed enum and rejects the whole document with a
400 if one is unknown — s3:GetObjectVersion and s3:DeleteObjectVersion exist in AWS but
not there. The presets use only accepted actions, and a test pins that.
Handing out a write-only upload key
The motivating case: an app embeds an S3 key in a shipped binary, so the key must be able to upload and nothing else, while the read/write key stays with the developer.
ovh_get_bucket bucket=dev-rgis-ar → note ownerId
ovh_preview_policy bucket=dev-rgis-ar preset=write-only prefix=uploads/
ovh_provision_s3_user bucket=dev-rgis-ar preset=write-only prefix=uploads/ \
description=ar-app-uploader confirm=trueThat creates a new project user (never the bucket owner), applies the policy, and only then mints credentials — a key that exists before its policy is a key that briefly had whatever the default allows. The secret is returned once.
Verify against the real S3 API before handing it over — a policy that reads correctly can still be shadowed by ownership, and wait ~30s after setting it or you will be probing the previous policy:
export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=... AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=...
# An array, not a string: zsh does not word-split an unquoted $var, so the
# `S3='aws ...'` form you would write in bash silently becomes "command not found".
S3=(aws --endpoint-url https://s3.uk.io.cloud.ovh.net --region uk s3api)
"${S3[@]}" put-object --bucket dev-rgis-ar --key uploads/probe.txt --body /dev/null # 200
"${S3[@]}" get-object --bucket dev-rgis-ar --key uploads/probe.txt /dev/null # 403
"${S3[@]}" list-objects-v2 --bucket dev-rgis-ar # 403
"${S3[@]}" delete-object --bucket dev-rgis-ar --key uploads/probe.txt # 403
"${S3[@]}" put-object --bucket dev-rgis-ar --key elsewhere/probe.txt --body /dev/null # 403The get-object line is the one that matters: it is the check that catches trap 3, and it
passes only because of the preset's Deny.
Develop
pnpm dev # tsdown --watch
pnpm test # vitest
pnpm typecheck
pnpm lint
pnpm formatLicense
MIT
Available Tools
1 toolovh_auth_statusOVHcloud: Auth StatusARead-only
Report whether this server has working OVHcloud credentials, which auth method and endpoint it uses, the default project and region, whether writes are enabled, and — when something is missing — exactly what to set. Call this first when a tool you expected is not listed: an absent tool here means missing configuration, not a bug.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The readOnlyHint annotation already marks this as safe, and the description adds useful behavioral context by stating it reports credential validity, auth method, endpoint, project/region, and write status. It also says missing credentials explain absent tools, which clarifies what the status check means. It doesn't explicitly describe network/read behavior, but the annotation plus 'report' wording make the safety profile clear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences carry a full purpose statement, a detailed list of outputs, and a usage rule. The key diagnostic trigger ('Call this first when a tool you expected is not listed') is placed second and is memorable. No word is wasted.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters, no siblings, and no output schema, the description is self-sufficient: it tells the agent what information the tool produces and when to invoke it. The only omitted detail, the exact configuration values to set, is precisely what the tool's output is described as providing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so there is nothing to document beyond the empty schema. The description still clarifies the kind of status data returned, which is consistent with a no-input diagnostic tool. Baseline 4 is appropriate for a 0-parameter definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Report whether this server has working OVHcloud credentials,' then enumerates exactly what is reported (auth method, endpoint, default project/region, write enablement). This is unambiguous and fully distinguishes the tool from any conceivable alternative, even though no siblings are listed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It gives an explicit call heuristic: 'Call this first when a tool you expected is not listed,' and even frames the diagnostic interpretation ('an absent tool here means missing configuration, not a bug'). This tells an agent not only when to run it but how to interpret the result.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct.
The lone tool name follows a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern. With only one tool, there are no inconsistencies to evaluate.
A single status-check tool is drastically insufficient for a server named 'mcp-ovh-api' covering the OVH cloud API. The count represents an extreme mismatch between the server's implied scope and its actual surface.
The server exposes no operations beyond an authentication status check. Any actual OVH API functionality is absent, making the tool surface severely incomplete for the stated domain.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
An MCP server that provides read access to your cloud storage providers, bank accounts and more.
Governed MCP gateway: one endpoint for your tools, with credential custody and audit log.
Read-only MCP server for AIStatusDashboard status, incidents, metrics, and fallback recommendations.
MCP server for Product Management
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AWS S3 — list buckets, browse objects, upload/download files, and generate presigned URLs.7904MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for uploading, listing, and retrieving files on S3-compatible storage (AWS S3, DigitalOcean Spaces) with public/private access and temporary URLs.15MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for browsing and reading S3 objects, with tools for listing buckets/objects, reading text and binary files, and extracting text from PDFs.
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) that provides tools to manage Compute, Object Storage, Block Storage, Networking, Autonomous Database, and IAM via the official OCI SDK.2367MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mgcrea/mcp-ovh'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server