okf-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to okf-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables full-text search and link navigation over Markdown files as a knowledge graph.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server and CLI that checks, maintains, imports, and upgrades Open Knowledge Format bundles — directories of Markdown concepts with YAML frontmatter — reporting findings and applying mechanical repairs locally. It runs one contract for agents, CI, and terminals, with no network access and no writes to git.30Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that turns a Markdown folder (e.g. Obsidian vault) into a second brain, capturing readings and ideas, connecting them as concepts, and resurfacing related notes on demand.36 npmMIT

neuphlo-mcpofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for a Markdown-backed knowledge repository, offering tools for searching, retrieving, validating, and authoring records, plus MCP Apps that render dashboards and inline tables in compatible clients.-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to search, fetch, and analyze a self-maintaining markdown knowledge base with provenance, drift detection, and canonical definitions.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that indexes Markdown, Word, HTML, and PDF documents into a SQLite knowledge graph with CJK+Latin full-text search and cross-document reference tracking. Runs drift audits to surface stale policies, conflicting research claims, superseded ADRs, and undocumented code exports.109MIT
TDQS
Scored across 28 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap between list_remote_bundles and list_bundles, and validate_bundle vs validate_project could confuse. Descriptions help clarify boundaries, but the redundancy slightly hurts disambiguation.
Naming mostly follows verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, validate_, etc.), but there are inconsistencies like graph_summary (not a verb) and the okf_ prefix applied only to some tools (okf_validate_concept vs validate_bundle). These are minor deviations.
28 tools exceed the 25+ threshold for too many. While the domain is complex, several tools are redundant (e.g., list_remote_bundles vs list_bundles) and many listing tools could be combined, making the surface feel bloated.
The server is read- and validation-heavy, with no create/update/delete operations for concepts or bundles. Proposals are only readable, and there is no tool to author or modify content, leaving significant lifecycle gaps for an authoring-oriented domain.