Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to okf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that turns a Markdown folder (e.g. Obsidian vault) into a second brain, capturing readings and ideas, connecting them as concepts, and resurfacing related notes on demand.
      28 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for a Markdown-backed knowledge repository, offering tools for searching, retrieving, validating, and authoring records, plus MCP Apps that render dashboards and inline tables in compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that indexes Markdown, Word, HTML, and PDF documents into a SQLite knowledge graph with CJK+Latin full-text search and cross-document reference tracking. Runs drift audits to surface stale policies, conflicting research claims, superseded ADRs, and undocumented code exports.
      10
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A CLI tool and MCP server that turns markdown documentation into a searchable, queryable knowledge base.
      74 npm
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is overlap between list_remote_bundles and list_bundles, and validate_bundle vs validate_project could confuse. Descriptions help clarify boundaries, but the redundancy slightly hurts disambiguation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Naming mostly follows verb_noun pattern (list_, get_, validate_, etc.), but there are inconsistencies like graph_summary (not a verb) and the okf_ prefix applied only to some tools (okf_validate_concept vs validate_bundle). These are minor deviations.

    Tool Count2/5

    28 tools exceed the 25+ threshold for too many. While the domain is complex, several tools are redundant (e.g., list_remote_bundles vs list_bundles) and many listing tools could be combined, making the surface feel bloated.

    Completeness2/5

    The server is read- and validation-heavy, with no create/update/delete operations for concepts or bundles. Proposals are only readable, and there is no tool to author or modify content, leaving significant lifecycle gaps for an authoring-oriented domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow