Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to okf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that turns a Markdown folder (e.g. Obsidian vault) into a second brain, capturing readings and ideas, connecting them as concepts, and resurfacing related notes on demand.
      45 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for a Markdown-backed knowledge repository, offering tools for searching, retrieving, validating, and authoring records, plus MCP Apps that render dashboards and inline tables in compatible clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that indexes Markdown, Word, HTML, and PDF documents into a SQLite knowledge graph with CJK+Latin full-text search and cross-document reference tracking. Runs drift audits to surface stale policies, conflicting research claims, superseded ADRs, and undocumented code exports.
      10
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A CLI tool and MCP server that turns markdown documentation into a searchable, queryable knowledge base.
      29 npm
      -

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct resources (concepts, bundles, graph, validation, computation), and descriptions clarify their specific scope. However, list_bundles and list_remote_bundles overlap since the former already includes remote bundles, and several validation tools have similar names. Overall, an agent can usually select correctly with clear descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming mixes conventions: many tools use verb_noun patterns (list_, get_, validate_), but some have an okf_ prefix (okf_get_proposal, okf_validate_concept) and graph_summary is a noun phrase. This inconsistency reduces predictability, though the overall style is still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 28 tools, the server exceeds the 25-tool threshold, making the set feel heavy. While the domain is complex, many listing and validation tools could be consolidated or generalized, and the count is high enough to overwhelm agents navigating the surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is comprehensive for a read-only, validation, and graph-analysis server: it covers listing, querying, validating, and graph traversal. Missing create/update/delete operations appear out of scope, and minor gaps like no get_bundle or get_tag are workable. Overall, the domain is well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSlow