Skip to main content
Glama
mfbaig35r

diligence-kernel

by mfbaig35r
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to diligence-kernel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Wokelo MCP Server by Wokelo-AI

      Wokelo MCP Serverofficial

      Wokelo-AI
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables dealmaking research for AI assistants, providing company intelligence, transaction data, and research deliverables via MCP.
      -

    • MCP Dataset Onboarding Server

      Magenta91
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables automated dataset processing and onboarding using Google Drive integration. Provides metadata extraction, data quality assessment, and contract generation for CSV/Excel files through natural language interactions.
      1
      MIT

    • Conflict-Check MCP

      mukesh10368
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language conflict-of-interest checks, historical relationship analysis, and contract review using Verdantas project data and Deltek records.
      -

    • TableRAG

      BitDG
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns Excel/CSV folders into a traceable, read-only AI knowledge layer; provides deterministic data queries, schema discovery, and evidence-backed search via MCP.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • INDUSS Research Intelligence

      viraj43
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform institutional research and due diligence by retrieving, extracting, validating, and citing data from public sources, then generating reports in markdown, HTML, or PDF.
      23
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct responsibility: opening a matter, describing tables, setting parameters, ingesting/searching documents, recording classifications, assembling units, running/estimating/monitoring table runs, reading/reviewing cells, and managing prompts/artifacts. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between tool names and their purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear `object_verb` pattern (table_describe, vault_ingest, units_propose, cell_review), but `run_table`, `run_estimate`, and `run_status` invert to `verb_object`, and a few names like `cell_evidence` and `artifact_list` are noun-noun. The pattern is predictable overall with minor deviations.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 19 tools, the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the count is justified by the breadth of the due-diligence workflow: ingestion, classification, table execution, evidence review, and artifact building. Each tool addresses a real step with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full review lifecycle: ingest documents, classify them, assemble review units, run table prompts, inspect evidence, record human review decisions, and build derived artifacts. There are no obvious dead ends—every produced object can be read, checked, or acted upon by another tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources