Skip to main content
Glama
metaneutrons

German Legal MCP Server

by metaneutrons
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to German Legal MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Rechtsinformationen Bund DE

      wolfgangihloff
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides access to the official German Federal Legal Information Portal (rechtsinformationen.bund.de) enabling AI agents to search German federal laws, court decisions, and legal documentation with authoritative citations from official sources.
      5
      23
      -

    • German Law MCP

      Movm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to current German federal law, supporting legislation search, provision retrieval, and citation handling.
      Apache 2.0

    • gesetzessuche

      Steffen-W
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for accessing and searching German federal law documents from gesetze-im-internet.de. Provides tools to retrieve specific paragraphs, perform full-text searches, and list available laws.
      10
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each search/get pair is scoped to a distinct source (arXiv, DIP, EUR-Lex, InfoCuria, German legislation, German courts, Austrian RIS), and the three DIP search variants are clearly differentiated by document type (Drucksache, Vorgang, Plenarprotokoll). Cross-jurisdiction overlaps like legis_get vs ris_get_norm are explicitly distinguished by country and purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use lowercase snake_case with source prefixes (arxiv_, dip_, eul_, icu_, legis_, rii_, ris_), and retrieval actions follow search/get/toc patterns. Minor inconsistency remains: get, get_document, get_decision, and get_norm are all used for retrieval depending on the module.

    Tool Count3/5

    20 tools is on the heavy side; each jurisdiction/source pair requires search+get, but the server bundles German, EU, Austrian, and even arXiv coverage under one surface. The count is defensible for the broad scope but approaches the threshold where splitting into per-jurisdiction servers would improve navigability.

    Completeness4/5

    Core research workflows are covered: search and full-text retrieval for legislation (German/EU/Austrian), case law (German/Austrian/CJEU), parliamentary documents, and scholarly preprints. Minor gaps exist — e.g., no obvious protocol retrieval beyond the DIP search results, and EU legislation lacks a TOC/norm-retrieval counterpart to legis_toc/ris_toc — but agents can complete main tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources