Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
German Legal MCP Server

German Legal MCP Server

by metaneutrons
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to German Legal MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Rechtsinformationen Bund DE

      wolfgangihloff
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides access to the official German Federal Legal Information Portal (rechtsinformationen.bund.de) enabling AI agents to search German federal laws, court decisions, and legal documentation with authoritative citations from official sources.
      5
      24
      MIT

    • recht-mcp

      nulegal-startup
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query German federal and state statutes, court decisions, and citation graphs, grounding citations, retrieving provision texts and versions, and understanding coverage limits through read-only tools.
      9
      1
      AGPL 3.0

    • German Law MCP

      Movm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to current German federal law, supporting legislation search, provision retrieval, and citation handling.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Domain prefixes (arxiv_, dip_, eul_, icu_, legis_, rii_, ris_) cleanly partition the tools, and within each domain the search/get/toc roles are distinguishable. The only mild risk is confusion among the many paired search/get tools across similar legal databases (e.g., rii_ vs ris_), but the descriptions explicitly disambiguate German vs Austrian and case law vs legislation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    A predictable prefix + action pattern dominates (search/get/get_document/get_decision/toc/search_vorgang). Minor deviations exist where noun suffixes replace verbs (dip_search_vorgang, dip_search_plenarprotokoll, ris_get_norm, *_toc), but these are still readable and consistent within their prefixes.

    Tool Count4/5

    Twenty tools is on the heavy side, but they map to genuinely distinct data sources (German parliamentary docs, EU law, CJEU, German federal/state legislation, German courts, Austrian RIS, plus arXiv), each needing search + retrieval. The count is justified by scope, though the arxiv_ pair sits slightly outside the server's legal core.

    Completeness4/5

    Full search-and-retrieve coverage across German legislation (search/get/toc), court decisions, EU legislation, CJEU, Austrian law (search/get/get_norm/toc) is present, appropriate for a read-only research server. Minor gaps remain, e.g., no cross-source citation/formatting helper and the out-of-domain arxiv inclusion, but core lifecycle needs are met.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessLimited data

    Resources