get_campaign_link_clicks_by_date

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does contribute one genuinely useful fact — 'Read-only' — but says nothing about required permissions, default date ranges, inclusive/exclusive bounds, pagination, or error behavior for a time-series query.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is short, but the second sentence ('SOAP operation: GetCampaignLinkClicksBetweenDates') merely repeats the SOAP name already given in the first sentence, so a third of the text is pure duplication with no added value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only query tool with no annotations, no output schema, and fully undocumented parameters, the description is inadequate. The lone 'Read-only' note is helpful, but date-range semantics and return shape are left entirely unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no information about the three parameters. It does not explain iCampaignID's expected source, nor how dFromDateAndTime/dToDateAndTime are formatted, bounded, or defaulted, so it fails to compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description restates the tool name by mapping it to its SOAP operation ('Calls GetCampaignLinkClicksBetweenDates'), which is a tautology rather than an explanation of what the tool returns. It never states that it retrieves link-click counts aggregated over a date range, nor does it distinguish itself from the sibling get_campaign_link_clicks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives. An agent cannot tell from this text why it would call this tool instead of get_campaign_link_clicks or get_campaign_results_by_date.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.