Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Grok MCP

Related Servers

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Scored across 22 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools are distinct, but `grok_agent` explicitly subsumes vision, files, web/X search, code execution, and image generation, overlapping heavily with `chat_with_vision`, `chat_with_files`, `web_search`, `x_search`, `code_executor`, and `generate_image`. `chat`, `stateful_chat`, and `chat_with_files` also have fuzzy boundaries between simple chat and agentic chat. Descriptions do help, but an agent could easily misselect.

Naming Consistency4/5

The set is dominated by a clear verb_noun pattern (delete_file, get_file, generate_image, list_files, upload_file, web_search, extend_video). A few outliers (`chat`, `stateful_chat`, `grok_agent`, `code_executor`) are noun- or adjective-led, but overall the convention is readable and mostly predictable.

Tool Count4/5

At 22 tools this sits at the heavy end, but the breadth (chat, stateful chat, files, vision, image, video, web/X search, code, models) genuinely justifies a large surface. The only redundancy is the all-in-one `grok_agent` duplicating several specialized tools, which could arguably be folded in.

Completeness4/5

File lifecycle is fully covered (upload, list, get metadata, get content, delete), chat and stateful-chat lifecycles are covered, and media generation includes image, video, and extend. Minor gaps remain (no listing of stateful responses, no video delete), but core workflows have no dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive