Grok MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Grok MCP
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation that enables Claude Desktop to interact with Google's Gemini AI models.616 npm259MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for xAI Grok API with 19 tools for chat, web and X search, session management, tool chaining, image and video generation, and documentation.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the xAI Grok API, providing tools for chat completions, vision analysis, web/X search, embeddings, and model listing via stdio.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Grok (xAI) that enables chat, reasoning, vision, and video generation using the AceDataCloud API.81MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for integrating xAI's Grok model into OpenAI Codex Desktop/GUI, enabling direct Grok calls via chat completions or responses with OAuth or API key authentication.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for generating and editing images using xAI's Grok image model, supporting text prompts, batch generation, local files, and optional proxy configurations.244 npm29MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProduction-grade MCP server for image and video understanding and generation across Gemini, OpenAI, and Grok.5171 PyPI4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools are distinct, but `grok_agent` explicitly subsumes vision, files, web/X search, code execution, and image generation, overlapping heavily with `chat_with_vision`, `chat_with_files`, `web_search`, `x_search`, `code_executor`, and `generate_image`. `chat`, `stateful_chat`, and `chat_with_files` also have fuzzy boundaries between simple chat and agentic chat. Descriptions do help, but an agent could easily misselect.
The set is dominated by a clear verb_noun pattern (delete_file, get_file, generate_image, list_files, upload_file, web_search, extend_video). A few outliers (`chat`, `stateful_chat`, `grok_agent`, `code_executor`) are noun- or adjective-led, but overall the convention is readable and mostly predictable.
At 22 tools this sits at the heavy end, but the breadth (chat, stateful chat, files, vision, image, video, web/X search, code, models) genuinely justifies a large surface. The only redundancy is the all-in-one `grok_agent` duplicating several specialized tools, which could arguably be folded in.
File lifecycle is fully covered (upload, list, get metadata, get content, delete), chat and stateful-chat lifecycles are covered, and media generation includes image, video, and extend. Minor gaps remain (no listing of stateful responses, no video delete), but core workflows have no dead ends.