Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-bridge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code to act as a project manager that delegates coding tasks to a pool of worker agents (Codex and OpenCode) defined as aliases in a YAML config, handling priority-based budget routing, parallelism with queues, resumable sessions, isolated git worktrees, and non-destructive merges. It returns token-cheap result reports with diffs and costs, plus Windows toast notifications and papercraft-style HTML round summaries.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Code and Codex to turn an ordinary conversation into an orchestrator that spawns, names, monitors, and revives separate work sessions, aggregates their questions for a single confirmation, and throttles parallelism based on memory and usage limits. Reports results back as a summary table without needing any extra app, daemon, or tmux.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI coding CLIs (Claude Code, Gemini/Antigravity, Codex, and OpenCode) to collaborate as a coordinated team by routing cross-agent prompts, sharing messages and review tickets, tracking tasks on a shared store, and isolating each agent in its own Git worktree with turn-budget safeguards—all inspectable and steerable from a local web dashboard.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to hand scoped, implementation-only coding tasks to any model available in a local opencode install — including Kimi, GPT, Gemini and local models — and to run many of them in parallel. Claude stays the orchestrator: it briefs each worker, collects results and needs-flags, then reviews diffs and runs tests, lint and builds itself.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: start vs. adopt vs. discover are well separated, as are get_agent (state/report) and get_diff (code changes). The main soft overlap is send_message vs. press_keys for interacting with a tab, and list_agents/get_agent/discover_sessions all report on agents, but the descriptions explicitly delineate when to use which.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows a strict snake_case verb_noun pattern (start_agent, list_agents, get_diff, capture_screen, set_model_policy, etc.), with no camelCase or vague single-word names. The convention is predictable and readable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    14 tools is well within the sweet spot and each maps to a real step in the orchestration lifecycle (spawn, discover, adopt, monitor, interact, tear down, model policy). Nothing looks like filler or a redundant convenience wrapper.

    Completeness4/5

    The agent lifecycle is essentially complete: create, discover/adopt, inspect state and diffs, message, wait, approve keys, stop with cleanup semantics, plus model catalog and policy management. Minor gaps exist around post-work outcomes (no tool to merge/apply an agent's branch or open a PR) and no explicit resume/restart tool beyond overloading send_message.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues