agent-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to agent-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to act as a project manager that delegates coding tasks to a pool of worker agents (Codex and OpenCode) defined as aliases in a YAML config, handling priority-based budget routing, parallelism with queues, resumable sessions, isolated git worktrees, and non-destructive merges. It returns token-cheap result reports with diffs and costs, plus Windows toast notifications and papercraft-style HTML round summaries.17MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude Code and Codex to turn an ordinary conversation into an orchestrator that spawns, names, monitors, and revives separate work sessions, aggregates their questions for a single confirmation, and throttles parallelism based on memory and usage limits. Reports results back as a summary table without needing any extra app, daemon, or tmux.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceOrchestrates multiple Claude Code agents across iTerm2 sessions with process-level isolation, enabling collaborative AI development workflows on multiple codebases with task-based inter-agent communication and persistent state management.71MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables a primary AI coding assistant to delegate tasks to specialized sub-agents in parallel, share project context, and synthesize their responses. It uses existing local CLI tools and API subscriptions to coordinate Codex, Claude, Cursor, and Gemini without extra cost.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI coding CLIs (Claude Code, Gemini/Antigravity, Codex, and OpenCode) to collaborate as a coordinated team by routing cross-agent prompts, sharing messages and review tickets, tracking tasks on a shared store, and isolating each agent in its own Git worktree with turn-budget safeguards—all inspectable and steerable from a local web dashboard.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to hand scoped, implementation-only coding tasks to any model available in a local opencode install — including Kimi, GPT, Gemini and local models — and to run many of them in parallel. Claude stays the orchestrator: it briefs each worker, collects results and needs-flags, then reviews diffs and runs tests, lint and builds itself.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: start vs. adopt vs. discover are well separated, as are get_agent (state/report) and get_diff (code changes). The main soft overlap is send_message vs. press_keys for interacting with a tab, and list_agents/get_agent/discover_sessions all report on agents, but the descriptions explicitly delineate when to use which.
Every tool follows a strict snake_case verb_noun pattern (start_agent, list_agents, get_diff, capture_screen, set_model_policy, etc.), with no camelCase or vague single-word names. The convention is predictable and readable throughout.
14 tools is well within the sweet spot and each maps to a real step in the orchestration lifecycle (spawn, discover, adopt, monitor, interact, tear down, model policy). Nothing looks like filler or a redundant convenience wrapper.
The agent lifecycle is essentially complete: create, discover/adopt, inspect state and diffs, message, wait, approve keys, stop with cleanup semantics, plus model catalog and policy management. Minor gaps exist around post-work outcomes (no tool to merge/apply an agent's branch or open a PR) and no explicit resume/restart tool beyond overloading send_message.