dms-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to dms-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for AI clients to browse and search project files securely, with configurable permissions, virtual paths, and key-based access.-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that enables AI clients to search a knowledge base and retrieve complete source documents via narrow search and fetch tools.2-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRead-only MCP server exposing homelab data sources (files, mail, calls) to Cloudflare OS, enabling read-only access to documents, emails, and call records.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server that extracts text and structure from PDF, DOCX, PPTX, SVG, and PNG files, along with directory and metadata listing, for read-only document analysis by LLM hosts.-

maha-mcp-bridgeofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceZero-trust local MCP bridge that exposes read-only database tools and structured book navigation to AI agents, with two-tier PII redaction and MPS audit integration.7 npm1MIT- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that enables AI assistants to search files, list directories, retrieve system info, and get file metadata on the local file system.4-
TDQS
Scored across 7 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: health check, connection listing, item listing, search, share URL resolution, metadata retrieval, and document reading. There is no overlapping functionality that would cause confusion.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_connections, list_items, search_items, open_share_url, get_item_info, read_document), but bridge_health deviates by using a noun phrase. The inconsistency is minor and does not impede readability.
With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped for a DMS read-access bridge. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count falls comfortably within the ideal range.
The server comprehensively covers browsing, searching, metadata retrieval, and document content access. However, it lacks any write operations (create, update, delete), which may limit functionality if full DMS management is expected. For read-only access, it is nearly complete.