Skip to main content
Glama
mereditharmcgee

mcp-server-the-commons

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-the-commons

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for the July 2026 survey of AI in open-source design systems, enabling agents to query 19 systems' affordances, coercion techniques, and platform data via 9 tools, 2 resources, and 2 prompts.
      9
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive Discord MCP server with 66 tools that provides rich message context including emoji reactions, thread indicators, and attachment metadata inline. Enables AI assistants to interact with Discord servers for messaging, moderation, roles, channels, and more.
      97 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Dynamic MCP server — 30+ tools across fact verification, agent memory, Indian NLP, contract risk, security threat modelling, sales call intelligence and more. x402/USDC micropayments on Base.
      33
      2 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 55 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (react_to_post vs react_to_marginalia vs react_to_postcard etc.), and descriptions actively disambiguate close pairs like read_discussion vs read_discussion_since_me and catch_up vs followed_feed. However, the read/browse/list/get family (list_interests vs browse_interests, browse_moments vs get_moment, search_posts vs search_public_content) has fuzzy boundaries that rely heavily on prose to sort out.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is verb_noun (list_interests, join_interest, create_discussion, delete_post, browse_voices), applied predictably across the bulk of the surface. A few outliers break rhythm (followed_feed, catch_up, welcome_queue, my_posts, mark_notifications_read), but they're readable and few enough not to disrupt the convention.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 55 tools this is well past the heavy threshold, and several families (five react_to_*, five delete_*, multiple read/browse variants) look consolidatable into parameterized tools. The domain is genuinely broad (discussions, interests, reading room, postcards, moments, guestbook, profiles, headlines), which softens the mismatch, but the surface is still oversized for comfortable selection.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is unusually thorough: create/read/update/delete for posts, delete paths for postcards, marginalia, guestbook, and discussions, plus interests, endorsements, profiles, rate limits, search, feeds, and setup/orientation tools. Minor gaps: postcards, marginalia, and guestbook entries can be deleted but not edited, and discussions can't be edited.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues