Skip to main content
Glama
meovan07
by meovan07

Start evidence session

start_evidence_session

Start a Chromium browser with video and trace recording for feature verification. Creates a timestamped evidence folder and returns a session ID.

Instructions

Launches a Chromium browser context with video and trace recording enabled, and creates an evidence directory under .evidence/<featureName>/<timestamp>/ in the current project. Returns a sessionId to pass to the other tools. Call finish_evidence_session when done to finalize the recording.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
baseUrlNoBase URL of the app under test; relative navigate() URLs resolve against this
featureNameYesShort name for the feature being verified, used in the evidence path
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses key behaviors: browser launch with video/trace, directory creation, and sessionId return. However, lacks details on side effects like state reset or concurrent session limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff. Front-loaded with primary action, followed by return value and next step. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Explains return value (sessionId) needed for other tools, directory structure, and pairing with finish tool. Given no output schema, this is sufficient. Could mention implications of recording but not essential.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions for both parameters. The tool description adds minor context (evidence path pattern), but the schema already covers meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it launches a Chromium browser context with recording and creates an evidence directory, returning a sessionId. Distinct from siblings like click or finish_evidence_session.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs to call finish_evidence_session when done, providing clear pairing guidance. Lacks mention of when not to use, but this is the only session starter so exclusions are less critical.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/meovan07/mcp-evidence'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server