A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceA wrapper around chrome-devtools-mcp that adds dynamic multi-browser routing, allowing connection to and switching between multiple Chrome instances at runtime.
6 npm
MIT
brave-mcp
by menoxz
Related Servers
Alternatives to brave-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides MCP tools to control real, logged-in Chrome or Brave browser profiles—tabs, navigation, clicks, and typing—with secure profile isolation and no network listener.32 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceControls a running Chrome/Chromium browser via the Chrome DevTools Protocol, enabling navigation, JavaScript evaluation, tab management, and raw CDP commands through MCP tools.5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to see and control the user's real Chrome/Brave/Edge profile over MCP, so they can read pages, click, type, take screenshots, audit layouts, debug CSS, and scrape paginated or infinite-scroll data. Because it drives the normal browser via the DevTools protocol with real input events, it works on modern JavaScript apps and on sites where the user is logged in.24 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for browser automation (Playwright + CDP + CLI) and bookmark management across Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Brave, including cross-browser sync, deduplication, and a React dashboard.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI agents to an existing Chromium browser profile through a local background service and extension, exposing browser control over MCP stdio. It lets agents navigate tabs, capture accessibility snapshots and screenshots, click, fill forms, type, scroll, drag, and run raw CDP commands, with multiple browser profiles selectable by ID.1 npmDo What The F*ck You Want To Public
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 34 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Several tools have overlapping purposes: fill, fill_form, and type_text all handle text input; browser_launch and browser_restart are nearly identical; browser_list and browser_status both report on browser state. While descriptions provide some clarification, an agent could easily misselect between these pairs.
Naming Consistency3/5
The majority of tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_pages, close_page, take_screenshot, navigate_page), but several browser management tools reverse this (browser_list, browser_launch, browser_status) and some tools are single verbs (click, hover, fill, drag). The mixed ordering and occasional vague names (emulate) create an inconsistent but still readable pattern.
Tool Count2/5
With 34 tools spanning page interaction, form handling, performance tracing, network/console inspection, and browser management, the server is heavily overloaded. While the domain is broad, the count exceeds the 25+ threshold and many tools could be consolidated (e.g., merging fill and type_text, or combining browser_list/status).
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers a comprehensive browser automation lifecycle: navigation, page selection, interaction, form filling, file upload, screenshots, snapshots, performance traces, and network/console inspection. Minor gaps include lack of explicit cookie management or request interception, but these can be worked around via evaluate_script.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues