Memwyre
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEMWYRE_API_KEY | Yes | Your Memwyre API key. Generate from the Memwyre Dashboard. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_memwyreA | |
| save_memoryA | |
| list_memoriesB | |
| get_documentA | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a fairly clear role: search finds relevant memories, list shows recent ones, get retrieves by ID, and save creates new content. Some minor overlap exists between search and list for locating memories, but the descriptions make the distinction workable.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (save_memory, list_memories, get_document), but search_memwyre breaks the pattern by using the product name instead of a noun like 'memories'. There is also mild inconsistency between 'memory' and 'document' as the noun for the same underlying resource.
Four tools is a well-scoped size for a personal knowledge vault server. Each tool covers a distinct core operation—save, search, list, and get—without unnecessary bloat.
The server covers create and read workflows well, including semantic search, but it lacks update and delete operations for memories or documents. This is a noticeable gap in lifecycle coverage, though simple note-taking use cases can still succeed.