law-search-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAW_API_OC | Yes | law.go.kr OpenAPI 식별자. 발급 신청: https://open.law.go.kr | contact |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| search_precedentsA | |
| get_precedent_detailA | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: search_precedents for listing/searching and get_precedent_detail for retrieving full details of a specific precedent. No functional overlap.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (search_precedents, get_precedent_detail) using snake_case, making them predictable and easy to understand.
With only 2 tools, the server covers the core workflow (search and detail retrieval) but feels slightly minimal compared to typical MCP servers that often include additional utilities or filtering options.
The tools adequately support search with multiple filters and detail retrieval, covering the primary use case. However, missing features like pagination control for detail views or batch retrieval are minor gaps.