memoire
Related Servers
Alternatives to memoire
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes a design system and UX rulebook as tools, enabling AI to generate UI consistent with your design tokens, components, layout rules, accessibility guidelines, and templates. It also provides a review tool to score UI proposals against the design system.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes your design system components and tokens to AI agents, preventing duplicate component creation and hardcoded token values.22 npm9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that gives LLMs deep knowledge of design systems and tokens, enabling intelligent design evolution, token analysis, and designer-to-developer handoffs.378 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for extracting UI components, design tokens, and patterns from websites and generating production-ready React, Vue, and HTML components.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for end-to-end UI development, offering tools to generate components, manage design tokens, audit accessibility, autofix issues, inspect live pages, compare screenshots, and more across multiple frameworks.1322 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceToken-efficient Figma MCP server with image export, query DSL, and design token support.10 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 50 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear descriptions that differentiate them. However, the large number (50) and some overlap between similar tools (e.g., pull_design_system vs pull_design_system_rest, multiple audit tools) could cause occasional confusion for an agent.
The majority of tools follow a consistent verb_noun convention (e.g., pull_design_system, get_specs, create_spec). Some deviations exist, such as adjective_noun patterns (check_bridge_health) or noun_verb (simulation_models), but these are minor and the overall pattern is clear.
50 tools is quite large for a single MCP server. While each tool serves a distinct purpose within the broad domain of design system management, the scope may be too broad, making the server feel heavy and potentially better split into smaller, focused servers.
The toolset covers a wide range of design system workflows: pulling, creating, generating code, auditing, simulating, and researching. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of explicit delete operations for specs or tokens, but the overall coverage is robust.